Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 1:09 PM
Subject: Fw: Facebook Considerations
Dear Presidents: Here is another perspective on
Facebook. We all need to consider the issues she is raising. I
invite discussion. Steve
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 9:57 PM
Subject: FW: Facebook Considerations
At
yesterday's meeting...
We
talked about using Facebook to find and recruit new members mostly
because it's free, easy to use, the latest fad for youngsters and
accessible to millions. I did not express my
concerns because it would have disrupted the conference. For the
record, I already have a Facebook account. Yesterday, we heard the pros
of Facebook, not the cons. I do not endorse it for recruiting. Let me
tell you why so you won't be surprised later.
I am a reserved, humble and happily married woman. My family is
precious to me, and I like to choose my friends (this will make more
sense later). I would never intentionally expose friends or family to
people that did not respect their values and personal choices, or could
potentially harm them in any way. Maybe I am an "old fart" for thinking
this way.
See for yourself.
Reason
1:
Facebook is "broadcast" messaging communications.
Meaning, when I write something on my page/wall everyone connected
to me can see it. If 10,000 people are connected to me, they will
all see the message to my friends and family. That could be
embarrassing, creepy and risky to me, my family and my friends.
If I was lonely or trying to sell something to people I didn't know,
then Facebook would probably be the ideal place to "get out" and "find
new leads". Seeking
companionship, gathering sales leads and providing community service are
uniquely different agendas.
In any case, I have to intentionally accept, reject or remove people.
There is no privacy unless I spend time learning and setting up Facebook
privacy, which is constantly changing. Don’t assume everyone on Facebook
cares. They don’t.
Here's my story:
Last year, my instructor told me to register on Facebook to get
schedules and handouts from guest speakers.
The idea bothered me then, but it was a
necessity, so I did it. The last year has made me regret being on
Facebook.
Reason
2:
Immediately I started getting requests from people I did not know "to be
a friend". Traditionally "a friend is
someone I actually know."
Let me
explain this.
Every
time someone already connected to me on Facebook, adds a new name to
their Facebook, I get new people wanting to connect to me. One
night I spent 3 hours rejecting 37 connections to people I had never met
and had no idea of who they were. I
accepted 22 people and I am still rejecting requests from people
connected to them. This is not fun
to me. Maybe if I were a sales person it would be.
Some
people are embarrassed when they get rejected.
That means Sertomans would have to "accept" every request "to be a
friend", to prevent offending anyone. Is that what we really want to
do? Image how vulnerable it makes Sertomans and their families? Forgive
my honesty; I’m just a conscientious old fart. We are like that
sometimes.
Facebook is work ...deciding who to be connected to is a personal
decision. Or, you can accept everyone as a friend and see how that
social experiment turns out for you. Most
likely it will overwhelm you.
Harvesting leads
is an old predator’s game on the Internet; it is not the Sertoman
culture I know. If Sertoma initiates harvesting leads, there is no
guarantee we will win at the end. We could offend another
organization.
Consider this:
If
names of Sertomans are published on Facebook, they may be aggressively
recruited by other organizations. Why not? We gave them the
information? It’s like inviting a vampire into your home.
Websites are safer for club members and
their families.
I recently had to send a message to a family member stating “I'm not
posting the names, telephone numbers or addresses of other family
members on Facebook...everyone has the right to make that choice for
themselves and to protect their privacy.” The leads harvester was
offended; other family members thanked me!
Reason 3:
When an invitation is declined on Facebook
some
people become persistent and bombard you with emails.
Facebook has exposed me to several
uncomfortable situations that were completely avoidable.
Reason
4:
I have
received requests from dating sites I never knew existed. Facebook let
them into my life. They act like they know me. They tell other people
they know me. This makes me queasy in my
gut.
Reason
5:
Prison
inmates have called my home and charged the cost of calls to my number,
even when "I refused the call". Now, I ask
myself, what if one of them showed up at my front door? Imagine "Hi,
I'm Mike (or Betty Boop) from Facebook, can I come in?" Well, the
telephone isn’t much different. Is it?
Reason
6:
Unauthorized charges were made to my cell phone. I didn’t even know it
was possible until it happened. Naturally, I had to contact the cell
phone company and reject the charges. It
was annoying.
Reason
7:
That
second level of people on Facebook will call you, your family and
friends and carry on conversations like they know
you
and them. Guess
what? They do...because they watch your conversations on Facebook.
It’s creepy. It’s not smart and it could put your family at risk.
When you talk about children and other family members in Facebook, you
tell predators things they can use “to be a friend” to them. It makes
them approachable and their guards are down; they become vulnerable. I
am truly concerned about the safety of my family members and friends on
Facebook, because of their openness.
Conclusion:
Identity theft experts advise us not to put cell phone numbers, home
telephone numbers, real addresses, travel plans and other personal
information on anything circulating in Facebook.
I don't put anything on Facebook. In November, I will either get off
Facebook or purge a lot of "unknown friends".
There
are predators in Facebook. Using it to recruit new members could be a
mistake Sertoma may never recover from. It could expose members to
being exploited by people they don't know, as well as having their
privacy violated 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If Sertoma endorses
Facebook, then we need a policy to prevent the members and connected
participants from being exploited (by anyone and everyone).
Who
wants to spend hours rejecting connections to people they don't know?
I'm OK with being an "old fart" if it means keeping my personal
integrity in tact and knowing the people that claim to know me.
Popularity by Facebook numbers is not necessarily the best way to
achieve our recruiting goals.
We need to spend some time thinking through this a little more. Giving
a direct "free" Facebook mailing list of my friends and family to
someone I don't know bothers me. Sertoma can not control Facebook or how
it changes. Once the information is out there, we can not take it back.
I think senior members have raised legitimate concerns that need to be
reconsidered. They have merit.
"Free"
social networking has a price.
What is Sertoma’s core culture? Where's
the fire? We have time to think this through.
Old
farts are practical people with experience. Some fads are not for
everyone. Facebook can be dangerous in the wrong hands. It can cause
situations we don't want to encounter. For someone in sales it can be a
goldmine! But, there is a price. Let's be very clear about our
objectives and the boundaries before initiating Facebook recruiting, so
no one is surprised
Lavella Harrison